NBA Playbook – A Look At The Playcalling In The NBA Through Videos, Pictures, & Words » Post-Game Adjustments: Spurs Need To Front Dirk On The Post
Home > 2010 Playoffs, Dallas Mavericks, Post-Game Adjustments > Post-Game Adjustments: Spurs Need To Front Dirk On The Post

Post-Game Adjustments: Spurs Need To Front Dirk On The Post

Throughout the playoffs, we are going to be looking at the teams that lost their last game and look at what they can do to try and get a win.

Dirk was phenomenal in game 1 against the Spurs, and while 12-14 from the field isn’t going to happen again, I think  the Spurs need to change up some things when covering Dirk.  The biggest adjustment I would make is I would have the Spurs front Dirk when he is on the post.  When Dirk makes the catch on the post with the defender behind him, he is so tall and so good at that little fade away jumper that it is almost guaranteed that he will get a good look when he makes the catch there.

So how do you stop him?  You don’t let him make the catch, and do to that you need to front him. Not a half-front either, the defender needs to completely front him and get in-between Dirk and the basketball.  The Spurs actually tried that little half over one shoulder front, but Dirk can come out so far and still be a threat it negates that.

So what does fronting do?  Well, first of all it takes Dirk out of his comfort zone.  Dirk is at home on that low block extended, and if you can make him catch it somewhere else he won’t be as comfortable.  Also, if you front him, you force a lob pass to go into him (to get it over the defender), this allows time to send help behind him and get an effective double team.

I think if you can make Dirk work a little harder, he won’t be going 12-14 from the field.  He is still going to put up numbers because he is a great player, but you need the Spurs need to try something different.  Playing behind him with a smaller defender obviously isn’t working.

  • vic
    @khandor,

    In game 1, I feel that Bonner was actually playing good defense on Dirk. His shots were contested. Dirk probably just had a "confidence advantage" going against Matt as he knew Bonner was less athletic. But if you watch at the process and not the result of Dirk v. Bonner one on one, it looks like good D, with tough shots going in. Plus a lot of ticky-tacky touch fouls that in no way could have influenced the shots that were taken to be called a whistle.

    But you are right, McD did a good job on Dirk. Although watching both games, nothing much changed. He also did an okay job on Dirk in game 1, but again, the shots just fell.
  • vic
    I feel that both clips were defended properly. Dirk just got some awesome shots in. You have to live with shots like that. As game 2 shows, the percentages come down back to earth. Fronting/doubling just gives a whole lot more problems. They just have to not foul him, as those are automatic points for Dirk. Also, they need to send "fake" doubles that just take swipes at the ball and go back to their man, just to make Dirk uncomfortable.

    Dirk is an awesome basketball specimen. Someone that tall shooting fade-away jumpers, almost no one can guard that. What's worse is that he knows no one can reach his high release faders, so an arm in his face won't really do much to his confidence in the shot. Overall though, that shot won't be made at a 90% clip all the time, probably at a 40-50% clip, which the opposing team could probably live with.
  • Sebastian,

    1. "Fronting" Dirk in the post is not the right way for the Spurs to handle this situation.

    2. The right way for the Spurs to handle this situation is ... exactly what Gregg Popovich did in last night's game ... from the portions which I saw.

    Q1. What "magic" did Pop use?

    A1. He very simply changed the individual match-ups and did his best to have Antonio McDyess go against Dirk every chance he could ... rather than a physically over-matched Matt Bonner ... and by having the Diceman "body-up" against the Howitzker, after the catch, whenever possible.

    Then, if/when Dirk has to put it on the floor, the Spurs sent a 2nd defender to initiate the late double-team AND, then, made sure that each of their other 3 defenders fully committed to completing their respective defensive rotations, come h*ll or high water [i.e. no matter what].

    3. If you try to full-front, in the NBA, against a multi-talented skilled player like Dirk, with his size, he will end up killing your team.

    Conversely ... if you commit to:

    i. Playing behind with the right individual defender
    ii. Pushing the offensive player out [i.e. off his sweet spot]
    iii. Then sending the double team
    iv. With a fully committed 5-man defensive rotation

    you will force other players on the opposition to have to beat you,

    which is your best hope for team success.
blog comments powered by Disqus