Should The Magic Have Fouled Down Two?
A Jameer Nelson jumper with 32.3 seconds left cut the Thunder’s lead from 4 to 2. With an eight second difference, coach Stan Van Gundy was faced with a pretty tough decision. He could either have his team foul, extend the game, and basically turn the game into a free throw shooting contest or he could have played straight defense, try to get the stop, and the tie or win the game. Van Gundy decided to play straight defense:
Unfortunately for him and the Magic, the Thunder were able to score (due to some poor defense from Hedo and a late help from Dwight Howard). Because this decision backfired, you have to ask if this was the right decision or not. In my opinion, it was the right decision, especially considering that the Thunder are the best free throw shooting team in the NBA.
However, with that being said, the Magic are one of the best three point shooting teams in the NBA. That means that if they extend the game and make their threes, they would have caught up in two possessions (they foul and the Thunder make 2 FTs – 4 point deficit, make a three – 1 point deficit, they foul and the Thunder make 2 FTs – 3 point deficit, make a three – tied game). With 32 seconds left, it isn’t really a stretch to say that is possible.
I am still leaning towards playing straight defense though. What do you guys think?
