What Were The Spurs Trying To Run On That Ginobili Shot? | NBA Playbook

What Were The Spurs Trying To Run On That Ginobili Shot?

We have looked at the play before it, and the play after it, and now we are going to take a look at the play that resulted in one of the craziest shots of the season.  With the Spurs trailing the Grizzlies by three points with 9.4 seconds left, they had one timeout left and the basketball on the side.  Deciding it was time to go for the three point shot, Gregg Popovich drew up a play to try and get a look from behind the three point line.  The result was mayhem:

The inbounds pass to Ginobili gets deflected, and after a few more deflections, the basketball ends up back in his hands.  Ginobili tries to get behind the three point line, but is unable to and gets off one of the longest twos you can take, knocking it down and putting his team down one point.

It was a crazy play, but I couldn’t help but wonder what the Spurs were trying to run, because it did look familiar.  If you were reading this site over a year ago, you might have recognized it from a Spurs-Cavs game last March:

It is hard to tell if these two plays are the same live, but if you break it down piece by piece, you notice that it was the same play:

Two1

The first thing that you should probably notice is the clock.  No, not the fact that the score was the same (eerie!), but look at the time.  There was 9.0 seconds left last season, and there was 9.4 seconds left tonight.  The play starts with George Hill (in both instances) running a rub screen for the man in the corner, Gary Neal instead of Roger Mason Jr.

Two2

As Neal (and Mason Jr.) is coming off of the rub screen to the top of the key, Manu Ginobili takes off towards the corner.  This is where the plays start to get a little different, but not by design.  Instead of going under Parker against the Grizzlies, Ginobili goes over Duncan, taking a strange path to the basketball.

Two3

Once Ginobili makes the catch in the corner, the play is designed for Gary Neal (or Roger Mason Jr.) to come off of a backscreen set by Duncan, get the pass from Ginobili, and take the three.  That never happened last night because the ball got deflected. Here is another look at Ginboili’s crazy shot:

First, I can just imagine coach Popovich with a notebook of his plays categorized by how much time he needs to run each one, and that is a pretty awesome image.  Second, and maybe most importantly, if the pass doesn’t get deflected, I don’t know if the Spurs get off a clean look.

This is all because Ginobili goes over top of Duncan for whatever reason.  Maybe it was the defensive pressure, maybe he just had a gut feeling that he had to get to the basketball, but the second Ginobili goes over the screen, the play is dead.  You notice it takes longer for the ball to get to Ginobili, forcing Neal to step up and be a safety valve.  This makes him too far away from Duncan to actually run off of the screen effectively.

We will never know if they play would have worked or not, and in the end it all worked out for San Antonio, but it is interesting (at least in my opinion) to see what they were at least trying to run late.

  • Ceeraresix

    The question I have to ask is whether the inbound/quick foul is the best play Memphis can run when up by 1 with 2.2 seconds left?

    I know it goes against classic strategy, but what about a player coming off a screen at the top, and just heaving (rolling?) a ball down court? What about the pass to the back court? What about a play on the second free throw that makes it difficult for Spurs to get possession (a strong heave off the back board, for example)? You know that the timeout moves the ball into the front court, and then there’s a 25% (?) chance of the Spurs making a 3.

    It’s different if there’s 6 second left, or even if there’s .5 seconds left, but this is the NBA. The best thinkers and strategizers should be at this level. This let down could cost Memphis a series.

  • Ceeraresix

    The question I have to ask is whether the inbound/quick foul is the best play Memphis can run when up by 1 with 2.2 seconds left?

    I know it goes against classic strategy, but what about a player coming off a screen at the top, and just heaving (rolling?) a ball down court? What about the pass to the back court? What about a play on the second free throw that makes it difficult for Spurs to get possession (a strong heave off the back board, for example)? You know that the timeout moves the ball into the front court, and then there’s a 25% (?) chance of the Spurs making a 3.

    It’s different if there’s 6 second left, or even if there’s .5 seconds left, but this is the NBA. The best thinkers and strategizers should be at this level. This let down could cost Memphis a series.

  • Ceeraresix

    The question I have to ask is whether the inbound/quick foul is the best play Memphis can run when up by 1 with 2.2 seconds left?

    I know it goes against classic strategy, but what about a player coming off a screen at the top, and just heaving (rolling?) a ball down court? What about the pass to the back court? What about a play on the second free throw that makes it difficult for Spurs to get possession (a strong heave off the back board, for example)? You know that the timeout moves the ball into the front court, and then there's a 25% (?) chance of the Spurs making a 3.

    It's different if there's 6 second left, or even if there's .5 seconds left, but this is the NBA. The best thinkers and strategizers should be at this level. This let down could cost Memphis a series.

  • Pete

    Another issue is that McDyess is awful at executing a great in-bounds pass. It really should have been Blair taking it out-of-bounds.

  • Pete

    Another issue is that McDyess is awful at executing a great in-bounds pass. It really should have been Blair taking it out-of-bounds.

  • Pete

    Another issue is that McDyess is awful at executing a great in-bounds pass. It really should have been Blair taking it out-of-bounds.

  • Timmystar40

    Nice find. However, I couldn´t help to notice that in the play against Memphis, Neal did not look like a designated shooter to me. Even though the inbounds pass gets deflected Neal is standing around remarkably inactive at that moment.

    Could it be the Spurs just want to put the ball into Ginobili´s hands and let him create his own shot? That could explain (1) Manu´s odd, but aggressive maneuvre over Duncan and (2) Neal´s complete inactivity after coming off the first Duncan screen.

  • Timmystar40

    Nice find. However, I couldn´t help to notice that in the play against Memphis, Neal did not look like a designated shooter to me. Even though the inbounds pass gets deflected Neal is standing around remarkably inactive at that moment.

    Could it be the Spurs just want to put the ball into Ginobili´s hands and let him create his own shot? That could explain (1) Manu´s odd, but aggressive maneuvre over Duncan and (2) Neal´s complete inactivity after coming off the first Duncan screen.

  • T2150

    Great post buddy and great memory to post the old play. You need to be working for an NBA team in the video room.

  • T2150

    Great post buddy and great memory to post the old play. You need to be working for an NBA team in the video room.

  • Guest

    Or Steve Novak!

    Oh, wait.

  • Guest

    Or Steve Novak!

    Oh, wait.

  • Timmystar40

    Nice find. However, I couldn´t help to notice that in the play against Memphis, Neal did not look like a designated shooter to me. Even though the inbounds pass gets deflected Neal is standing around remarkably inactive at that moment.

    Could it be the Spurs just want to put the ball into Ginobili´s hands and let him create his own shot? That could explain (1) Manu´s odd, but aggressive maneuvre over Duncan and (2) Neal´s complete inactivity after coming off the first Duncan screen.

  • T2150

    Great post buddy and great memory to post the old play. You need to be working for an NBA team in the video room.

  • spurfan

    I think the play was meant for Hill. We’ll never know though

  • spurfan

    I think the play was meant for Hill. We’ll never know though

  • Guest

    Or Steve Novak!

    Oh, wait.

  • Jon Sparks

    This is the a variant of a play that the Suns use to run with Amare getting the ball at 18 feet and Nash (who starts in the far corner) setting the flare screen for the inbounder (often a shooter like Dudley). Nash (the eventual flare screener) would often be open too.

  • Jon Sparks

    This is the a variant of a play that the Suns use to run with Amare getting the ball at 18 feet and Nash (who starts in the far corner) setting the flare screen for the inbounder (often a shooter like Dudley). Nash (the eventual flare screener) would often be open too.

  • ignarus

    awesome breakdown, especially remembering the old play and what it was supposed to look like!

  • ignarus

    awesome breakdown, especially remembering the old play and what it was supposed to look like!

  • spurfan

    I think the play was meant for Hill. We'll never know though

  • Jon Sparks

    This is the a variant of a play that the Suns use to run with Amare getting the ball at 18 feet and Nash (who starts in the far corner) setting the flare screen for the inbounder (often a shooter like Dudley). Nash (the eventual flare screener) would often be open too.

  • ignarus

    awesome breakdown, especially remembering the old play and what it was supposed to look like!