<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NBA Playbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nbaplaybook.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nbaplaybook.com</link>
	<description>A look at play-calling in the NBA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple but effective works for OKC by David</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/02/04/simple-but-effective-works-for-okc/#comment-7942</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18273#comment-7942</guid>
		<description>subtly awesome. nice review, Brett. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subtly awesome. nice review, Brett. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A look behind the Magic Collapse by Rajan Patel</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/27/a-look-behind-the-magic-collapse/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18157#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>You overestimate how open Duwight is on those plays.  Fact is, it comes down to Duwight creating his own shot.  Since he has no post moves, no touch, this is a difficult proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You overestimate how open Duwight is on those plays.  Fact is, it comes down to Duwight creating his own shot.  Since he has no post moves, no touch, this is a difficult proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hope for the Knicks? by The Daily Peep, Feb. 3 &#171; HoopSpeak.com</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/02/03/hope-for-the-knicks/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Peep, Feb. 3 &#171; HoopSpeak.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18269#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>[...] John Bennett watched the Knicks/Bulls game last night with his eyes on New York’s point guards. Here’s what he took away from it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Bennett watched the Knicks/Bulls game last night with his eyes on New York’s point guards. Here’s what he took away from it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hope for the Knicks? by Psihadal</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/02/03/hope-for-the-knicks/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>Psihadal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18269#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe they gave up Billups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t believe they gave up Billups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hope for the Knicks? by Tracy Crum</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/02/03/hope-for-the-knicks/#comment-7934</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Crum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18269#comment-7934</guid>
		<description>That was a very good breakdown.  This team has to keep fighting and working together to develop chemistry.  In time they can get to a very decent level of ball, even if TD and Shump are the best PG options.  In the team concept they can certainly play better.   Just making the simple pass.  I see improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a very good breakdown.  This team has to keep fighting and working together to develop chemistry.  In time they can get to a very decent level of ball, even if TD and Shump are the best PG options.  In the team concept they can certainly play better.   Just making the simple pass.  I see improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Griffin&#8217;s dunk not the only thing worth talking about by &#187; Thursday linkage: Feb. 2, 2012 The Crab Dribble</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/31/griffins-dunk-not-the-only-thing-worth-talking-about/#comment-7933</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Thursday linkage: Feb. 2, 2012 The Crab Dribble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18246#comment-7933</guid>
		<description>[...] Besides, everyone knows the real basketball fans were talking about Reggie Evans after that game [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Besides, everyone knows the real basketball fans were talking about Reggie Evans after that game [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Irving entering Chris Paul territory by Serata da incubo per il Gallo. Melo ritorna ed i Knicks vincono &#171; filippotozzi</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/26/irving-entering-chris-paul-territory/#comment-7930</link>
		<dc:creator>Serata da incubo per il Gallo. Melo ritorna ed i Knicks vincono &#171; filippotozzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18086#comment-7930</guid>
		<description>[...] a guidare i compagni senza dover andare 1 contro 5 ad ogni possesso. E c&#8217;è chi dice che ricorda il primo Chris Paul. Andiamoci piano per adesso con i paragoni, ma continuaiamo ad osservarlo, perchè [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a guidare i compagni senza dover andare 1 contro 5 ad ogni possesso. E c&#8217;è chi dice che ricorda il primo Chris Paul. Andiamoci piano per adesso con i paragoni, ma continuaiamo ad osservarlo, perchè [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Griffin&#8217;s dunk not the only thing worth talking about by The Daily Peep, Jan. 31 &#171; HoopSpeak.com</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/31/griffins-dunk-not-the-only-thing-worth-talking-about/#comment-7928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Peep, Jan. 31 &#171; HoopSpeak.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18246#comment-7928</guid>
		<description>[...] Brett Koremenos is like, “Who cares about Blake and his stupid dunk? Let’s talk about Chris Paul!” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brett Koremenos is like, “Who cares about Blake and his stupid dunk? Let’s talk about Chris Paul!” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Griffin&#8217;s dunk not the only thing worth talking about by Sfernald</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/31/griffins-dunk-not-the-only-thing-worth-talking-about/#comment-7927</link>
		<dc:creator>Sfernald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18246#comment-7927</guid>
		<description>So are you saying Paul is pretty good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you saying Paul is pretty good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The latest move in Bulls-Heat chess match by Lukerygh</title>
		<link>http://nbaplaybook.com/2012/01/30/the-latest-move-in-bulls-heat-chess-match/#comment-7926</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukerygh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nbaplaybook.com/?p=18206#comment-7926</guid>
		<description>Watching the game, I understood the keeping Rose out of foul trouble, but my initial feeling was the Heat were on a run, starting to break out a lead, and Thibs ran it to through a speed bump in the roll they were on. Whether or not it was actually effective, it did slow down momentum and give the bulls a chance to regroup. I would like to see it used in such situations in the playoffs when needed. I am not a fan of the offensive rebounds, but I am a fan of forcing long shots </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the game, I understood the keeping Rose out of foul trouble, but my initial feeling was the Heat were on a run, starting to break out a lead, and Thibs ran it to through a speed bump in the roll they were on. Whether or not it was actually effective, it did slow down momentum and give the bulls a chance to regroup. I would like to see it used in such situations in the playoffs when needed. I am not a fan of the offensive rebounds, but I am a fan of forcing long shots </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

